Hey look, a blog post about Brian Brooks
March 5th, 2010Wow. Haven’t seen one of these around here for awhile. Are they becoming extinct? No, they’re just busy being turned into papers, projects, or ideas for various orgs. A ton of exciting personal news to update, but that’s for another day. Now, for the main attraction:
Note: This post isn’t an attack on Brian Brooks, the person. This is an opinion of the decisions he made and how I see them as indicative of problems within the J-School.
Now, if you look to your left, you’ll see the major debacle over the Brian S. Brooks, the Associate Dean at the Missouri School of Journalism, e-mail(s). Depending on who you talk to, Brooks effed up big time with the first e-mail, and even the second e-mail, according to some. I’ll let Justin Scott explain. Or you can check out his screenshots – e-mail 1; e-mail 2. Short summary? Brooks pissed off a bunch of people by using an unfortunate incident at the Black Culture Center (BCC) as a handjob for the Journalism School and it’s students. In the first e-mail, he uses “sexual…preference” and “tolerance”, which many found offensive (read Justin’s post for more). The second e-mail, an apology (I use that in the loosest sense of the term), also ruffled feathers. He stated the first e-mail was to “support MU’s African American students” (it didn’t), apologized, turned the handjob on himself, apologized again, then took the hand back towards the students (that sounds wrong – no more handjobs in this post).
If you want my opinion on this incident directly, read Justin’s post – it’s a pretty good mirror of my thoughts.
This is a post on the larger impact. How does this incident affect the Journalism School beyond the here-and-now.
These e-mails represent the overarching mentality of J-School administration – that the norm is fine. There is no rallying cry from our “leader”. There is no call-to-action, no plan or steps to make things better for our School or the University. Both e-mails have a “we’re fine as we are” theme. Brooks does not put anything out there to say, “hey, here is why this will never happen at the Journalism School…”, instead, he just says, “hey, don’t do this shit. I don’t want to be embarrassed.”
Apply that sentiment to other situations within the School. Over the past year, there have been a number of events, groups, and student out-cries for innovation and change in the Journalism School’s curriculum and the way it approaches things. However, outside of a few individual professors, change seems to be nonexistent. We keep hearing that we’ll “be fine”, while other schools aren’t settling for “fine” – their administration is gunning for unchallenged best. Frankly, I don’t see that in the Mizzou Journalism School administration, and this e-mail dictates that.
Many Mizzou J-School students are already ‘elitist’. Brian Brooks did nothing to help this. Actually, he did quite the opposite. In an e-mail that should have been about bringing people together, Brooks chose to segregate, using terms like, “…the best students at MU are Journalism students.” Is that a joke? I know plenty of Journalism students who suck at journalism, and at being a student, in general. Why? E-mails like these two make them think that simply by having “University of Missouri Journalism” on their degree means they’re set for life. These are the writers who “just really want to be Bill Simmons”, but without the work ethic. These are the broadcast students who think Anderson Cooper’s job is cushy. These are the StratComm students that left Broadcast for StratComm because they “want to make more money”, are “really creative”, or are “really, really good at talking to people!” (barf).
The administration is not in tune with the students. This point ties back to the first, but it deserves it’s own recognition. Simply put, the students and the administration are usually on entirely different wavelengths – in entirely different galaxies. Brooks will pop up every so often, get some face-time and maybe even make the obligatory “we’re working on it” statement. That’s it. Not once have I seen Brooks reach out to students on a personal, unforced basis. Many students see him, but feel like he is unapproachable. How difficult would it be to do a lap around the J-School and RJI every so often, talking with students and asking what they think of such-n-such.
Yes, this is a two-way road. Next week, I am going to e-mail Dean Brooks asking to meet with him, preferably over a casual lunch. Maybe in the J-Cafe. I’ll student charge it. You know, nbd. Not to grill him, not to harp (or even mention) this incident, but to talk about journalism and my beloved (if occasionally misguided) Journalism School.
These three things are what I immediately picked from the e-mails. There is a lot to disagree with, sure, but what happened… happened. I know it’s cliché, but college is one big cliché so far.
It’s your move – student, faculty, and administration alike. We can continue to look backward and use this as an excuse, or move forward and us it as a catalyst.
I’m moving forward. Are you?

